Video Presentation Rubric
|
||||
|
|
Beginning
1 – 12 |
Developing
13 - 24 |
Accomplished
25 - 37 |
Distinguished
38 - 50 |
|
Content
& Organization – Is
your project organized and documented? |
Not
organized. Difficult
to follow. Poor quality shows poor
effort. |
Portions
may be poorly documented and/or organized.
Hard to follow the progressions of the story. Explanation shows some effort. |
Fairly
well documented and organized. Format
is easy to follow. Good explanation
shows good effort. |
Program
shows a continuous progression of ideas and tells a complete, easily followed
story. Well documented and
organized. Excellent, well thought out
explanation shows superior effort. |
|
Usefulness – Does
your video stay focused on an informative topic? Does it promote the use of technology to
inform the audience about the topic? |
Project’s
usefulness is in question. Does not
inform; does not stay focused on the topic. |
Project
demonstrated development of computer technology; has problems staying focused
on topic. |
Project
is focused and informative; promotes the use of computer technology to create
the video to deliver information. |
Project
is focused and very informative; promotes the use of computer technology to
create the video and makes others want to use the same type of format in
delivering information to an audience. |
|
Creativity
& Elements of Design – Is your video interesting?
Did your choice of elements such as film clips, pictures, backgrounds,
and transitions enhance the project? |
Use
of elements detracts from video. Too
many or too gaudy graphics; transitions, too many clips, backgrounds and/or
sounds detract from content. Pictures
or video clips may be out of focus or “shaky”. |
Minimal
use of design elements. No
transitions. Sound is lacking or
inappropriate or scratchy. Some pictures
or video clips may be out of focus or “shaky”. |
Good
use of graphics and/or other design elements.
Some transitions are inappropriately placed. Sound quality is OK. Video clips or pictures are clear and in
focus. |
Excellent
sense of design. Effective camera
techniques used for the video and pictures.
Video and pictures are I focus and of good quality. Smooth transitions are appropriate and aid
in delivery of the presentation. |
|
Mechanics – Did you check your
grammar and usage? Have you correctly
documented sources and obeyed copyright rules? |
Includes
five or mare grammatical errors, misspellings, punctuation errors; sources
are not documented. |
Includes
3 – 4 grammatical errors, misspellings, punctuation errors; some sources are
documented but not correctly. |
Includes
2 – 3 grammatical errors, misspellings, punctuation errors; sources are
documented and correctly and copyright law has been followed. |
Grammar,
spelling, punctuation, capitalization are correct; sources are documented
correctly and copyright law has been followed. |
|
Oral
Presentations Skills – Did you respond to the questions by the students and instructor
with ease? |
Great
difficulty communicating ideas. Poor
voice projection; no eye contact; no introduction; mispronounced words;
stopped or had long pauses; confused. |
Some
difficulty communicating ideas. Poor
voice projections; some eye contact; no introduction; mispronounced a few
words; long pauses; somewhat confused. |
Fairly
fluid delivery. Communicates ideas
with proper voice projection; perhaps one mispronounced work; made eye
contact; introduced self and project.
Respond to questions. |
Well-rehearsed. Voice, eye contact and pacing hold interest
and attentions of audience; introduced self and project. Responded easily to questions. |